๐–ข๐–ฎ๐–ญ๐–ณ๐–ฑ๐–ฎ๐–ต๐–ค๐–ฑ๐–ฒ๐–จ๐– ๐–ซ ๐–ฅ๐–ค๐–ฃ๐–ค๐–ฑ๐– ๐–ซ ๐–ถ๐–ฎ๐–ฑ๐–ช๐–ค๐–ฑ ๐–ก๐–ด๐–ธ๐–ฎ๐–ด๐–ณ ๐–ฏ๐–ซ๐– ๐–ญ ๐–ฒ๐–ฏ๐– ๐–ฑ๐–ช๐–ฒ ๐–ญ๐– ๐–ณ๐–จ๐–ฎ๐–ญ๐– ๐–ซ ๐–ฃ๐–ค๐–ก๐– ๐–ณ๐–ค

The Trump administration has introduced a controversial new federal buyout program, offering nearly 2 million civilian employees full pay and benefits through September if they voluntarily resign by February 6. Dubbed the โ€œdeferred resignation program,โ€ the initiative seeks to reduce government costs and increase in-person attendance, as only 6% of Washington, D.C., employees currently work on-site.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has dismissed claims that the plan is a politically motivated purge, framing it instead as a cost-cutting measure to improve efficiency. Supporters argue the move is essential for streamlining the federal workforce and adapting to modern work demands.

However, criticsโ€”including union representativesโ€”warn the program could severely weaken public services. They argue that while framed as voluntary, the policy may pressure long-term employees to leave their positions, effectively forcing attrition under the appearance of choice.

The program has sparked intense debate, with proponents seeing it as a necessary shift toward fiscal responsibility. They contend that reducing the federal payroll will free up resources for more effective governance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *